¼öÁ¤Ã¼ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄÀ¯È­¼ú Áß ¹ß»ýÇÑ °¢¸·È­»ó 1¿¹
A Case of Corneal Burn During Phacoemulsification

´ëÇѾȰúÇÐȸÁö 2014³â 55±Ç 3È£ p.454 ~ p.458

ÀÌÈ¿¼®(Lee Hyo-Seok) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÅÂÈñ(Lee Tae-Hee) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç
À±°æö(Yoon Kyung-Chul) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¾È°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¸ñ Àû: ÃÊÀ½ÆÄÀ¯È­¼ú Áß ÁßÁõÀÇ °¢¸·È­»óÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÑ È¯ÀÚ¿¡¼­ ÀÌÂ÷ÀûÀÎ ¼ö¼ú ¹× ¾à¹°Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ º¸°íÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÑ´Ù.

Áõ·Ê¿ä¾à: 89¼¼ ¿©ÀÚȯÀÚ°¡ Ÿ º´¿ø¿¡¼­ ¼º¼÷¹é³»Àå¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­ ÃÊÀ½ÆÄÀ¯È­¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà ¹Þ´ø Áß Åõ¸í°¢¸·Àý°³ºÎÀ§¿¡ °¢¸·È­»óÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿© º»¿øÀ¸·Î Àü¿øµÇ¾ú´Ù. ³»¿ø ´ç½Ã ½Ã·ÂÀº ±¤°¢ÀÖÀ½À̾ú°í ¼¼±ØµîÇö¹Ì°æ °Ë»ç»ó ÁßÁõÀÇ °¢¸·ºÎÁ¾ ¹× Àý°³ºÎÀ§ ÁÖº¯¿¡ 3.0¡¿3.0 mm Å©±âÀÇ »óÇÇ°á¼Õ°ú ±âÁúȥŹÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. »óºÎ °ø¸·Àý°³Ã¢À» ¸¸µé°í ¹é³»Àå ³¶¿ÜÀûÃâ¼úÀ» ½ÃÇà ÈÄ »ïüÇü ¾ÆÅ©¸± Àΰø¼öÁ¤Ã¼¸¦ ¼öÁ¤Ã¼³¶ ¼Ó¿¡ »ðÀÔÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ú ÈÄ °¢¸·ºÎÁ¾¿¡ ´ëÇؼ­ ½ºÅ×·ÎÀ̵å¿Í ÇÔ²² 5% NaCl Á¡¾È¾×À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 1°³¿ù° °¢¸·ºÎÁ¾ ¹× Åõ¸í°¢¸· Àý°³ºÎÀ§ÀÇ »óÇÇ°á¼ÕÀº ÇöÀúÇÏ°Ô °¨¼ÒÇÑ ¼Ò°ßÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç ±³Á¤½Ã·ÂÀº 0.06À̾ú´Ù. ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ 3°³¿ù° Àΰø¼öÁ¤Ã¼ÀÇ À§Ä¡´Â ¾ÈÁ¤ÀûÀ̾ú°í, Àý°³ºÎÀ§ ÁÖº¯À¸·Î ÁߵÀÇ °¢¸·È¥Å¹ÀÌ ³²¾Æ ÀÖ¾úÀ¸³ª °¢¸·ºÎÁ¾Àº °ÅÀÇ ¼Ò½ÇµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ±³Á¤½Ã·ÂÀº 0.2·Î È£ÀüµÇ¾ú´Ù.

°á ·Ð: ÃÊÀ½ÆÄÀ¯È­¼ú Áß ¹ß»ýÇÑ ÁßÁõÀÇ °¢¸·È­»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© Ãß°¡ÀûÀÎ ¼Õ»óÀ» ¸·±â À§ÇØ °ø¸·Àý°³¸¦ ÅëÇÑ ¹é³»Àå ³¶¿ÜÀûÃâ¼ú°ú ¾à¹°Ä¡·á¸¦ ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ÁÁÀº °á°ú¸¦ °ÅµÎ¾î À̸¦ º¸°íÇÏ´Â ¹ÙÀÌ
Purpose: To report a case of severe corneal burn during phacoemulsification that was successfully managed with a second operation and medical treatment.

Case summary: An 89-year-old female had phacoemulsification of a mature cataract in her right eye, and was transferred to our outpatient clinic after development of a thermal burn at the corneal incision site. On initial examination, visual acuity was light perception and slit-lamp examination revealed diffuse, severe corneal edema, and a 3.0 ¡¿ 3.0 mm-sized epithelial defect with severe stromal opacity around the incision site. Extracapsular cataract extraction through superior scleral incision was performed with posterior chamber implantation of a 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lens (IOL). Topical steroids as well as hypertonic saline were used to manage corneal edema postoperatively. One month postoperatively, her best corrected visual acuity was 0.06 and slit-lamp examination showed markedly decreased corneal edema and epithelial defect. Three months postoperatively, her best corrected visual acuity was 0.2, the IOL was centered in the capsular bag, and corneal edema nearly disappeared with remnant moderate corneal opacities.

Conclusions: We report successful treatment of severe corneal burn during phacoemulsification managed with extracapsular cataract extraction through scleral incision and medical treatment.

Å°¿öµå

Corneal burn, Extracapsular cataract extraction, Phacoburn, Phacoemulsification
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed ´ëÇÑÀÇÇÐȸ ȸ¿ø 
ÁÖÁ¦ÄÚµå
ÁÖÁ¦¸í(Target field)
¿¬±¸´ë»ó(Population)
¿¬±¸Âü¿©(Sample size)
´ë»ó¼ºº°(Gender)
Áúº´Æ¯¼º(Condition Category)
¿¬±¸È¯°æ(Setting)
¿¬±¸¼³°è(Study Design)
¿¬±¸±â°£(Period)
ÁßÀç¹æ¹ý(Intervention Type)
ÁßÀç¸íĪ(Intervention Name)
Å°¿öµå(Keyword)
À¯È¿¼º°á°ú(Recomendation)
¿¬±¸ºñÁö¿ø(Fund Source)
±Ù°Å¼öÁØÆò°¡(Evidence Hierarchy)
ÃâÆdz⵵(Year)
Âü¿©ÀúÀÚ¼ö(Authors)
´ëÇ¥ÀúÀÚ
DOI
KCDÄÚµå
ICD 03
°Ç°­º¸ÇèÄÚµå